Masthead Image
Alice in Texas - Tea Tray in the Sky Austin Bay Blog Black Five Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Michael Totten Grunt Doc Treacher - Blowing Smoke Cold Fury INDC Journal Drumwaster's Rants The Fat Guy Politburo Diktat Wizbang Citizen Smash Chris Muir's Day by Day NRO Mark Steyn Protein Wisdom Truth Laid Bear Ace of Spades HQ Roger L. Simon iowahawk Captain's Quarters Vodka Pundit Powerline Blog Samizdata Lileks Tim Blair Scrappleface Little Green Footballs Michelle Malkin Instapundit
My West texas dot com
Movable Type
Quicktime Movie

Archives
Atom (XML)
RSS (XML)
RSS 2.0 (XML)

Americans are Losing the Victory!


MIDLAND BLOGS

2 Dolphins
ArchaeoTexture
Bleu Chocolate
Fire Ant Gazette
Libertarian Flux
Livin' it and lovin' it
Lone Star Bunker
Sleepless in Midland
Specs and Wings
Superbike Blog
Walked w/ Angels
West Texas Missioner
West Texas TV

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Midland EDC
City of Midland
Midland County
MIDCAD
LiveMidlandTexas

LOCAL MEDIA

KCRS 550AM
MyWestTexas.com
NewsWest9.com
CBS7.com
KMID-TV
Odessa-American
KWEL 1070AM

EZ Rider

As is my custom, I like to see how our fair Bus System is performing using the data published by the Federal Transit Administration (the folks who dole out the Federal Money to EZ Rider). The data is almost useless for decision making, since it is for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Yes that's right, local transit authorities are required to submit detailed reports MONTHLY to the FTA via the Internet and all annual reporting must be done no later than April 30 of each year. Revisions are allowed up until July 2 and then everything is closed out. We the public don't get to see any of this data in an easy to access format until a formal report is shoved out the door in late November or December. This bureaucratic sloth is appalling. Try operating a public company and telling the SEC you'll state your financials about a year after after the fact, or even submitting your tax return to the IRS that late!

Anyway, here we are at the close of 2006 and we can now see how EZ Rider (and all the other transit authorities) did in 2005.

All of these figures come from the National Transit Database

Operating IncomeNTD2004NTD2005
Fare Revenues$131,414$193,007
Local Funds:298,083$362,659
State Funds:256,191$307,429
Federal Funds:825,809$910,407
Other Funds:1,966$0
TOTAL$1,513,463$1,773,502
Operating ExpensesNTD2004NTD2005
Salary, Wages & Benefits$976,342$1,146,348
Materials & Supplies253,966$358,310
Other Expenses283,155$268,844
TOTAL$1,513,463$1,773,502

Now what about passengers?

NTD2004NTD2005
UPT Bus226,215298,606
UPT ParaTransit6,65214,590
Total237,867313,196

So what is this in numbers anyone can understand? Well, according to the report it cost $5.35 for every bus UPT (unlinked passenger trip) and $12.16 for every para-transit UPT. UPT is a bureaucratic terms, which basically means every time a passenger walks onto a bus. In Midland it takes, on average, 4 UPT's to make a round trip on a bus and 2 UPT's on a paratransit. So in 2005 it cost $21.40 for every person who traveled on a fixed route and $24.32 for every person who traveled on an on demand bus to make a round trip. In 2004 these figures were $24.72 and $34.90 respectively. EZ Rider is getting better, but it still is costing the taxpayers about $19.40 per round trip passenger served!!!

Now let's look at the cost per Bus UPT in 2005 for other communities:

San Angelo$6.50
Amarillo$6.21
Midland$5.35
Waco$4.77
Kileen$4.64
San Saba$4.64
Houston Metro$3.23
National Average$2.81
Abilene$2.18
Lubbock$1.58

In comparison to other Texas Cities, EZ Rider isn't the most expensive bus system to run per passenger, but it is near the top of the list of comparable cities.

So, for the estimated 315 people that ride EZ Rider each and every working day, enjoy the "13x your money" subsidy from the taxpayers. Where else can the users spend $432 per year for a service that costs $5,627 per year to provide?

4 Comments

Imagine how expensive the system would be if it were not A SMASHING SUCCESS!

I wonder if all the "Free Shuttle" ridership to things like the Feast of Sharing will be added to the passenger counts sent to the Feds. That will make the UPT costs look better, but you can still find the waste in the percentage the fares make up of your transit system income.

EZ Rider's fares make up a shade under 10% of the budget, while fares make up a little over 30% of Lubbock's.

Face it, EZ Rider is a check box on an ED Amenities Survey and a way to sink $360k local dollars into a project to garner $1.2M in State and Federal money for about 40 transit jobs.

On second thougt, $360k for 40 jobs? That's a better track record than the MDC.

I was in a good mood until I read this post. Thanks a lot! :-)

Seriously, though, if these numbers aren't proof positive that we're too small and too self-mobile a community for a viable transit system, then I don't know what is.

I bet we could set up a travel voucher system for half the price.

I noticed during the holidays that we are now using bigger vehicles to transport not very many more people...wonder how the 2006 numbers will come out re: price per ride. The most I can say for the bigger busses is that they are moving advertisements. It would be interesting to see how the routes break down as to ridership...do, for instance, many people ride to work at Cingular? The other day at 5PM, hordes of cars were coming out of the parking lot there.....

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.