It's the charge that matters

This poster, a Photoshop job of Mr. Obama made up into Heather Ledger's Joker, has gone viral on the internet, even crashing websites which display it. One site I tried to visit yesterday took two minutes to load. I wonder if their advertising rates went up.
Predictably the right-wing is loving this--I haven't felt this good since I got a franchise-tax refund from the State of Texas. Finally, someone is calling a socialist a socialist. The left, however, is howling and showing themselves as being even sillier than usual. They loved George W. Bush being made into Hitler, which is surely much viler than the Joker. We are supposed to believe that this poster is racist because it shows His O'liness made up as a minstrel, which is fishing to be sure.
Steven Mikulan of the L. A. Weekly fancies that he is being trenchant when he gives us
It has a bit of everything to appeal to the drunk tank of California conservatism: Obama is in white face, his mouth (like Ledger's Joker's) has been grotesquely slit wide open and the word "Socialism" appears below his face. The only thing missing is a noose.
Notice that the point of the poster, that Obama is a socialist, is completely ignored. Without doubt Obama is a socialist, but that doesn't play in Peoria, or lots of places in tax-paying and responsible America. That Obama is a tax-and-spend socialist is the left's dirty little secret and with this sleight of hand Mikulan wants us to cringe before an absurd charge and ignore the very point of the poster.
Some years ago when Taco Bell introduced that talking chihuahua, the spokesman for a Hispanic group cried that the commercial was racist. It must have been racism of an appealing type: completely inexplicably to me, the sales of chihuahuas went up; a chihuahua is more properly understood as dog food, not a dog.
We all know true racists--people who simply cannot believe that anyone of a certain group can do anything right and who enjoy their misfortune. We also know people who are by default inclined to take a bigoted view but that view is not set in stone. A default racist, perhaps. One could call them racists by being predisposed against say blacks, but if it's not a blanket animus we'd have to declare it to be a lesser shade of racism. Not a good thing at all, but less vile than a blanket, immutable hatred.
Since the left cannot win its arguments by fact or logic, it must use thuggery. And one of the best means of thuggery is leveling foul charges, and it doesn't really matter if they're substantive or not. It's a tried-and-true technique: on Friday, October 13, 1307 (hence the idea that Friday 13 is unlucky), King Philip the Fair (really) of France, who was in debt to the Knights Templar, ordered their mass arrest. The accusations including denying Jesus, peeing on the cross and homosexual activity. The charges were enough to lead to the eventual destruction of the Knights Templar's great power and wealth. Were they true? It didn't matter and the king got his mitts into a big chunk of other people's money.
Today the left issues charges of being mean-spirited, selfish, and most of all, racist, against anyone that they don't agree with. It's easier than arguing a point, or trying to, and it's very often successful, causing people to cringe. Remember that scandal when Texaco board members were utterly traduced by a recording which did not in fact say what it was supposed to say, and by deliberate misconstruction of the tape? It was the seriousness of the charge and not the facts of the case. It's an adult, and much meaner, version of the boy on the schoolyard screaming, "Girl cooties!" and all the other boys run away.
Based on the risible and vacuum-headed declaration of Mr. Mikulan that the maker of the poster and people who find it amusing or even truthful are lynching Klansmen, I hereby declare charges of racism emitting from the left as being nothing but hot air, and an acknowledgement that they have no argument. I wonder if anyone on the left is capable any more of making a logical argument for their positions? After all, they've gotten very far by skulduggery.
Just like Don Corleone.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: It's the charge that matters.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.jessicaswell.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2659
5 Comments
Where's the poster?

John, I think that you're utterly right in thinking that liberals are racists when they expect someone to act a certain way. It is not the racism which they so neatly define but entirely to their own advantage. But it is certainly bigotry.
I noticed that every time Our Empress Hillary was either about to be exposed for skulduggery or intended to don some brass knuckles, she accused either her exposers or her victims of what she had done or was going to do. This is called projection.
Wallace, the poster started in LA but has gone viral and is cropping up all over.
How nice.
What strikes me is the left's inability to make a cogent argument. They are people of tastes, not ethics.

I'm a HUGE fan of Keith Ledger and (The Bod) Barrack !!!!!
But I can't find this ANYWHERE on the 2 places I looked on the Internet !!!! Because I have a LIFE and YOU brought it up , it is YOU'RE card to play !
I admit I am a LIBERAL and I swell up to an even BIGGER LIBERAL thinking of Barrack .....but what buttons on this keyboard must I push here..
If you're going to bring this up , don't you think SOMEONE should come over and SHOW ME how to get this photo on my computer ! Someone say, 6'2 ,180 lbs who jogs . He or she , I'm ambivalent when it comes to size....nevermind , neither here or there !
You conservatives are all alike ! You think you know everything and so you leave the rest of us in the dark !
You brought it up ! You OWE me my picture !
How in the world would you expect me to find it !
I want it NOW !
Right Now !

Ms. Language Person ! Mother requests you change the Capital YOU'RE to YOUR .
Hop to it .
Mother has threatened to sue for every hour you MAKE me look like an idoit !
Hop to ! Hop tpo !





Isn’t expecting someone to act a certain way because he belongs to a certain group the definition of Racism/Bigotry? And isn’t that exactly what Mr. Mikulan is doing regarding Republicans/Conservatives in this article? Doesn’t that make Mr. Mikulan a Bigot?
I believe Liberals (especially Radical Liberals) learned a great lesson during the period known as the “Red Scare”: Call someone else a Communist before they call you one. This steals their thunder and deflects suspicion. I think these Liberals call Conservatives Racists/Bigots because a) they feel guilty over their own racist tendencies (real or perceived), or b) they are out & out Racists and they want to deflect suspicion from themselves.
That's just my opinion - what do you think?