Economic Development in the news
Dell proves high cost of tax giveaways.
Remember Winston-Salem.That should be the new rallying cry every time a politician starts talking about the need for tax breaks or other incentives to lure jobs.
This month, Round Rock-based Dell announced plans to close its factory in the North Carolina city by January, less than five years after it opened. In the process, it's eliminating about 900 jobs as it cuts costs by shifting manufacturing overseas.
In wooing the plant, North Carolina officials offered Dell more than $240 million in tax breaks over 15 years, touting the possibility that the plant could someday employ 8,000.
Instead, the soon-to-be-shuttered factory stands as a monument to the dangers of overzealous economic development, when local governments give away revenue in exchange for the long-term promises of jobs that can't be kept.
"This is just another example of the risk that a state and local government is taking when it gives a tax break," said Bernard Weinstein, an economist at Southern Methodist University and a longtime critic of such tax abatement programs. "It makes no sense in economics, but I do understand the politics. Politicians want to be seen as delivering jobs to their communities."
I guess we can place Professor Weinstein's name on the list of folks never to be brought in by the ED poobahs to "educate" us all on local economic development issues and philosophy in lieu of scheduling Ray Perryman for 2,341st time.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Economic Development in the news.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.jessicaswell.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2742





It just goes to show you that there are more factors into community growth than throwing money at a company to create and sustain jobs.
Like the Goodyear/Firestone facility stories I found a couple of years ago, even an economic incentive cash payment that was equal to 115% of one year's salary for all the remaining workers wasn't enough to keep that facility open for another year. What's cheaper than free labor?
Kind of like here, what makes the 1,500 or so jobs out of our local economy's 70,000 or so jobs worthy of a subsidy?