Aircraft engines firm gets MDC reprieve [Plain English version]
Jessica's Well is beta testing a ChamberSpeak
For today's test we will use an article from last Friday's (05/28/2010) edition of MyWestTexas.com regarding the MDC's dealing with a local aircraft powerplant manufacturer.
Caught between an impatient City Council and local investors who put big money into a 3-year-old aircraft engine company, the Midland Development Corp. on Friday voted to table consideration of making its economic development incentives deal with Trace Engines more stringent.
Plain English:
Caught between an impatient City Council and local investors who put big money into a 3-year-old aircraft engine company, the Midland Development Corp. on Friday voted to table consideration of actually enforcing the mutually agreed-upon development contract with Trace Engines.
Trace Chief Operating Officer David Czarnicki and Midland oilman Buddy Sipes, the firm's first investor, appeared before the MDC board at City Hall to ask that the $400,000 forgiveable loan the company received in 2007 not be converted into a standard loan that must be repaid.
Plain English:
Trace Chief Operating Officer David Czarnicki and Midland oilman Buddy Sipes, the firm's first investor, appeared before the MDC board at City Hall to ask that the $400,000 forgiveable loan the company received in 2007 be considered a gift from the taxpayers of Midland and not a loan of any sort. Especially one of those icky kind of loans that have to be repaid.
Arguing that the 2008-09 recession had rendered impossible the contract that the company signed in 2007 to create 114 jobs, Czarnicki said, "2007 engine sales are down by 50 percent. "That's had an effect on our ability to get up to speed. I am concerned that the amendment is not in the spirit of the original agreeement."
Plain English:
Arguing that the 2008-09 recession had rendered impossible the contract that the company signed in 2007 to create 114 jobs, Czarnicki said, "2007 engine sales are down by 50 percent. "That's had an effect on our ability to get up to speed and I would like us to rethink what should be the "spirit" of the agreement...because the actual text of the agreement is pretty much kicking our a** right now."
Czarnicki said afterward that Trace "is already a lean organization" with 23 employees at 3000 W. Interstate 20, but it will probably cut its staff if the MDC follows the council's recent suggestion and makes the loan non-forgiveable.
Plain English:
If the taxpayers aren't going to pay 'em, then nobody is going to be paying them.
The former councilman revealed that "what we bought as technology was not as (it had been) guaranteed" by the Orenda Recip Co. of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and an extra $10 million expenditure was required before a Federal Aviation Administration production certificate could finally be obtained last fall.
Plain English:
We've figured out why Orenda sold us this technology now.
Sipes said Trace, having paid more than $340,000 in local property taxes, didn't seek tax abatements because the 2007 economy looked like it would remain strong.
Plain English:
Please consider the fact that we didn't ask for even more public subsidies when considering whether or not to gift us that $400,000.
Okay, I am going to stop now for a couple of reasons. First, the translator seems to be working flawlessly. Second, because I am making a bit too light a serious subject.
Trace Engines is a company that is a venture being attempted by several smart, good men, and one that is fraught with risks. The fact that they are having struggles is of no comfort to anyone here. The success or failure of the venture has a real effect on real lives. This we know all too acutely here. What humor that we do find is strictly based upon the complete torture inflicted on the language when describing loans that aren't really loans, and both sides trying to figure out how to get around an agreement that is very plain in its intent and one that they never thought they would have to enforce. That is really kind of funny. But the struggles of a local company is deadly serious stuff.
Having said that....as noble and honorable a venture as these men have undertaken in trying to build a company it is their venture and should remain strictly their venture. There should be no government involvement in it whatsoever save the enforcement of laws (and, ironically, agreements) and the protection of private property rights. There should not be two separate and distinct classes of local businesses. One class either connected to or favored by the local development authorities and therefore eligible for public subsidies in the form of tax breaks and in many cases the outright transfer of funds from public coffers into private hands....and the other class....where individuals or groups of individuals venture into the marketplace with their product or their idea, unsubsidized with cash gifts forcebly taken from their neighbors, to survive or perish based solely upon the value of their product or service to a consuming public free to choose between competing goods.
But then I'm old-fashioned that way.
I wish those behind Trace Engines the best of luck and much success. But it is your venture and you should be risking only your own money and that of any willing investors. Period.
I have hardened a fair amount on this issue over the past couple of years. Before I was sort of of the opinion that if you have a set of people offering up free money (even if is taken from the local taxpayers) that you can't blame a company for taking it, right?
In the face of galloping government spending at every level, and now an absolute crushing amount of public debt set upon us by both elected and non-elected officials at every level.....then, yes, absolutely I can blame them for taking the money.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Aircraft engines firm gets MDC reprieve [Plain English version].
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.jessicaswell.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3013
11 Comments
Dissembling we've got. You mean disassembling, yes?

You're right Wals ! Even the spellcheck won't help my stupid . My bad .

That is a great idea. Lets shut down the MDC. These are the only people looking to bring Midland any type of new industry and economic diversity. But who needs economic development? Who doesn't enjoy driving through downtown Midland and seeing empty buildings, where business should occupy the space? Who needs the benefit of businesses paying taxes which would contribute to the local economy and potentially lessen the burden of the individual tax payer?
The MDC doesn't have an easy job by any means and it is essential to growth for Midland. I firmly believe the MDC will have more success in the future and the people of Midland could be more supportive if they truly want growth in their local economy.
Everytime I look on here people are bashing the MDC and/or companies affiliated with the MDC. At least there is a concentrated group of people in Midland that are trying to move business forward and be constructive, instead of just sitting behind their computers complaining.

I think that Business Supporter - if that's his or her real name - just called out the Well people or at least labeled you guys again-ers. This suddenly got interesting.
I think he needs to do a better job of showing how MDC has moved business forward and been constructive (Dean Baldwin, Countrywide or the hundreds of thousands spent on Live Midland?). Their record in bringing in the types of jobs they campaigned on has been poor and their communication with the public has been worse.
Now I prefer to sit back and watch the fun begin.

Business Supporter: With all due respect, the idea that a bureaucracy such as the MDC is the path to true economic development is just wrong. It has been 10 years now and they have no real success stories, numerous flops, and a couple of outright laughers. Actual people advance the economy, not unaccountable political appointees.
Have a look at the Yellow Pages and please tell us how critical something like the MDC was in the creation or maintenance of any of those many and very diverse businesses.

"No real success stories, numerous flops, and a couple of outright laughers" ... AND yet the MDC's administrative budget has grown to approximately $1 million annually.
My question to the MDC diehards would be: At what point, at the very least, is it fair to compare the MDC's track record to its cost? Never? Because we (diehards) supported it in the beginning and the ED paradigm is unassailable? So just continue on the same course in perpetuity lest we get egg on our face?

Let's give this the "Franklin" test .
On a sheet of paper list all endeavors by the MDC.
On another sheet of paper list all the successes and next to the successes list all the failures .
I think that should be easy enough to do and easy enough to see if the MDC is worth it .

Holy Toledo, so glad I clikecd on this site first!

SFm5k6 omhmhlwdawwf

OramyV jryfaqwrotaj





Thank you Walsingham . This has been my point of contention with the MDC . If any business begins to fail after receiving government money ,do you not think the government entity that loaned the money would stop at anyhing to insure the business would NOT fail lest they look like fools ?
Including more and more and more money?
MDC is a sorry ,sorry idea which must be dissembled.